|
Title IV-D is destroying families and the U.S. government promotes children to grow up in broken homes that leds children down the path of violence, gangs, drugs, teenage pregnacy, jail, and death. We need to reform our own laws and fix our own problems and not promote bad laws across the world. I urge you to write the amassador's of other countries and let know this bad law the United States is pushing is no good and refuse to sign the amendment. The United States government is allowing children to be kidnapped of the United States and many children have a higher risk of getting abused or murdered. The US government now wants to award kidnappers and murders by giving them child support payments to the country they run off to. The US government will not go enforce child kidnapping laws that are in the current Hague treaty and they will not confront countries that are blocking a parent from having meaning contact with their children. This law was made without any representation of children or families that have been victimized by these bad U.S. anti-family laws. No organizations that represent these families and children were not consulted on this amendment. Please let the contact below know that you are disappointed that this amendment was proposed without documentation or research to support it and that it is hostile against families and children. Frederike Stikkelbroeck, Attaché to the Secretary General
Tel: +31 (70) 363 33 03 or +31 (70) 302 99 68 (direct)
Permanent Bureau, Hague Conference on Private International Law
Fax: +31 (70) 360 48 67 E-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
6, Scheveningseweg, 2517 KT The Hague, The Netherlands Website: www.hcch.net Ms. Mary Robinson UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Council of the European Union
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Press Release http://thehague.usembassy.gov/child_support.html About The Hague and it's 68 members. http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php Hague Members to Contact: http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=states.listing Send the letter in the format provided: Template we can all submit individually asap:
His Excellency [AMBASSADOR'S NAME]
Ambassador And Permanent Representative
[COUNTY NAME] Mission To The United Nations
MISSION ADDRESS
New York, N.Y. 100XX DATE
Ref: Proposed New Amendment to the Civil Aspects of The Hague Convention
Regarding International Child Support Enforcement and Its Relationship
With The Abuse, Atrocities and Violations of Human Rights, International
Treaties and Charters1 by the United States and its Judiciary.
WARNING: SIGNING AND RATIFICATION OF ANY FAMILY AND CHILD-RELATED CONVENTION OR TREATY WITH THE UNITED STATES AS A PARTY STATE WILL UNLAWFULLY ENDANGER AND PENALIZE YOUR CITIZENS AND NATIONALS INVOLVED CHILD CUSTODY AND SUPPORT AND RESULT IN DESTRUCTION OF THEIR FAMILIES, DEPRIVE THEM OF THEIR CHILDREN, AND RENDER THEIR CHILDREN FATHERLESS/MOTHERLESS AND EVEN SUBJECT YOUR CITIZENS TO UNLAWFUL IMPRISONMENT.
See Below, and also http://webpages.charter.net/lah1321/
Your Excellency,
I am writing to inform, caution and ask your government to refrain from
approving, signing and ratifying the proposed amendments to the Civil
Aspects of The Hague Convention regarding International Child Support
Enforcement, indeed any new treaties and amendments, that involves the
United States as party State. The reason simply being that the United
States has not only knowingly and persistently been violating, misusing
and abusing the provisions of the international treaties and conventions
(fn 1), but also it has been fraudulently using the Child Protection and
Support laws, including the Hague Convention, to perpetrate social
engineering and commit fraud in conjunction with the governments of its
50 federated states resulting in 100,000.00s of children being, forcibly
or through unlawful and unconstitutional judicial orders, separated and
alienated from their fit and loving parents (primarily their fathers) in
order that those very judiciary who (unlawfully and with conflict of
interest) issue the said separation orders creating "custodial"
and "non-custodial" parents (instead of allowing children to
benefit and enjoy their natural right to BOTH parents even when the
latter are divorced), along with their respective state officials
benefit from a federal incentive scheme that provides federal kick-backs
to each state, its officials (county prosecutors) and "family"
court judges whenever they deprive a parent of equal custody, i.e.
artificially creating an adversarial environment between parents in
which the only beneficiaries are the courts and the state officials and
judges (collectively, the "beneficiaries"), and the most severely hurt are the children who are deprived of one of their (fit) parents (mainly the father who is made the "non-custodial" parent with limited "visitation" in order to create more income and incentive for the said beneficiaries. Typically less "visitation" means more child support payment, and higher resulting kick-back to states). The beneficiaries, who artificially create the very condition of "custodial" - "non-custodial" parents and deprive children of a fit parent, benefit3 financially from such deprivation. This draconian and feudal system, which is at the very least fraudulent and unconstitutional (re US' own Constitution), is a means of creating immoral profit by the said beneficiaries on the backs of depriving children of loving and fit parents. Such state sponsored terrorism and child kidnapping by the US and the said beneficiaries perpetrated upon families in the US are incorporated in the US Codes (42 U.S.C. 655 et seq., commonly known as "Title IV-D") whereby the (50) states and their "family" courts, judges and officials are enticed into creating one-parent children and breaking up homes as, under the said Codes, states receive reimbursement/incentive money for creating "custodial" - "non-custodial" parents (even when both divorced parties are fit parents and deserve and have a right to equal parenting). Hence, artificially generating child support enforcement cases.
THE RESULT OF TITLE IV-D POLICY ON SOCIETY
Long ago, the US started seeing the destructive results of the above
Title-IV-D policy whereby not only the said policy and law resulted in
children being deprived of one of their (fit) parents, but combined with
the "No-Default" divorce policy in most of the 50 states, it resulted in greater marriage and family break ups for financial profit encouraged by unscrupulous beneficiaries in "family" courts. This is leading to the destruction of the fabric of the society in the US which is NOT the image presented to the outside world. As a result the US society has turned into a gulag of dysfunctional families with results of such child support policies and enforcements that include, but are not limited to the following, and which you may expect your
citizens and nationals to experience in a child custody case in a US
court, if the proposed Hague amendment is ratified:
1- discriminatory deprivation of EQUAL parental rights to the custody
and upbringing of your citizens' children, and children's rights to
enjoy life equally with BOTH parents even when the latter are divorced.
Vast majority of "family" courts in the US would not even allow
private and amicable arrangements between divorcing parents because a
private arrangement or an equal custody arrangement that involves no
court ordered support enforcement would deprive the beneficiaries of
their kick-back incentive.
2- discriminatory assignment of child support against your citizens
(especially if they are fathers) by US courts, and almost automatically
and as a matter of course depriving your citizens of his/her parental
rights and equal custody of his/her children, hence generating their
kick-backs.
3- inordinately large number of single-parent families and children
whose other parents have been forcibly removed from their lives because
of kick-back incentives sought by US courts.
4- absence of involvement of one parent resulting in additional monetary
and cost burden on the social services required by the single-parent
family whereby the other parent has been removed from the children's
lives through the said kick-back policy. Alienation of children against
the "absent" parent for monetary gain encouraged by the US
"family" courts' kick-back motivations.
5- increase in crime rate in society because one fit parent and a role
model has been removed from the child's life in order to create the
kick-back. In many relationships US courts have tipped the balance and
caused break ups in which reconciliation would have otherwise resulted.
6- experience in US "family" courts show it is almost a forgone
conclusion for a foreign citizen to lose custody and rights to his/her
child and have support, usually unlawful, assessed against him/her.
After all, this is a source of revenue for the very judges who determine
such cases.
7- as the incentive kick-back system depends upon child support
enforcement, there is a strong incentive to unlawfully, unfairly,
egregiously and repetitively increase it in order to create additional
"enforcement" cases. This, in many instances, results in
unconstitutional incarceration of the "non-custodial" parent
(yes, very likely a similar fate awaits your citizens, through a US
"family" court order). Hence, creating not only a gulag of
dysfunctional families, but also one of multitude of fit and respectable
parents who are criminalised, as is the case in the United States.
WHAT ACTION YOUR GOVERNMENT MAY TAKE
A- unless and until the US government repeals its Title IV-D Codes and
arrangements (a trap sitting in waiting for your citizens) with its 50
states in this regard, your government should refrain from signing any
treaties with the United States, especially if it involves family,
children, custody, and their support issues. The US has already shown
its disdain for the international laws and treaties it has signed and
ratified, even for its own Constitution and laws. Your citizens are
victims in waiting vis-a-vis child custody and support matters in a US
"family" court.
B- build into any treaty and convention with the United States as a
party water-tight safe guards against such abuse by the US
"family" courts and do not allow automatic acceptance of any US
"family" court decision without examination of each case by a
judicial court of your own country ensuring that the US court decisions
live up to the international standards and norms of human rights,
fairness and family and child protection, and that your citizens'
children are not mere pawns for the immoral profit that US courts,
judges and officials hope to reap from their
fatherlessness/motherlessness.
Should you require further information regarding any of the above issues
and experience in the US "family" courts, please do not hesitate
to contact the email address on the above web site.
Yours Sincerely,
________________
SENDER'S SIGNATURE
1
Including, but not limited to:
THE HAGUE CONVENTION REGARDING ABDUCTION OF CHILDREN, INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN, UNITED NATION INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS, THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS.
2
"That it is the view of the United States that States Party to the Covenant should wherever possible refrain from imposing any restrictions or limitations on the exercise of the rights recognized and protected by the Covenant, even when such restrictions and limitations are permissible under the terms of the
Covenant. For the United States, article 5, paragraph 2, which provides
that fundamental human rights existing in any State Party may not be
diminished ". "The United States declares that it will continue to adhere to the requirements and constraints of its Constitution in respect to all such restrictions and limitations. (3) That the United States declares that the right referred to in article 47 may be exercised only in accordance with international law." UN Charter 77 (signed 10.05.1977, Date receipt of Inst. 06.08.1992).
3
US federal "incentive"
kick-back per state typically amounts to $100,000,000.00s annually.
Therefore, the lure of greed of state officials and "family" judges, especially in view of their corrupt nature with almost unrestrained power, is very strong and deprives children of having BOTH their parents, and deprives parents of their children, all for the kick-back money.
As an example, in the state of Indiana the kick-back "earned",
through the misery of children and families is divided up as follows:
22.2% goes to the county "family" court and pension plans of very judges who separate the children from one (fit) parent in order to create a child support scheme, 34.4% goes to the county prosecutors who prosecute and incarcerate "non-custodial" parent unlawfully for contrived default on payment, 22.2% of goes to the county general budget which administers this draconian and feudal system. The rest is for general disbursement.
|
